Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with a global score of 81.2 against 79. Motorola Edge 50's body is much newer, lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a quite better 1220 x 2712px resolution and a just a bit better display pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S count with similar battery durations, although the Motorola Edge 50 has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.