Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a global score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's overall score of 79. The OPPO Find X3 Pro construction is newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide you very similar operating system features.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality, higher video frame rate and a higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.