Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 OS. Even though the Galaxy A32 is a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's just a little bit lighter and also newer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32. Both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. The Galaxy A32 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S feature extremely similar batteries, although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has a 0% lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.