Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with an 82.3 score against 79. Galaxy A60's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it was released just 10 months before. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should offer the same OS features.
The Galaxy A60 has a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior battery life than Galaxy A60, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.