Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A80 is a better device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it must be told that it's also an older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier device.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and the Galaxy A80 feature quite similar displays, they have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a same size display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A80 features a processing unit that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S one, and although the Galaxy A80 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has improved battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 48 MP camera in the back, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.