Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it gives some nice extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little better display density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a larger aperture and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.