Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 79 against 77.8. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is noticeably older and a lot thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a larger display, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a little higher pixel density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a lot higher video definition, a more megapixels back facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.