Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a 79 score against 78.8. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per screen inch.
The vivo X60 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 0.5 inches sensor, a same resolution back facing camera and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher video frame rate. Vivo X60 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features improved battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.