Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, getting an 83 score against 81.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T design is older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 features a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little bit higher pixel number in each inch of display, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a quite bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and Motorola Edge 50 count with quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.