Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 396 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's global score of 83. Galaxy A32's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but it's a little heavier. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T works with Android 10 operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a better display pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have a same resolution camera, a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates. The Galaxy A32 has more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and Galaxy A32 both feature very similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.