Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with an 87.1 score against 83. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note9 is notably older and a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's construction is still just a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.