Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an overall score of 83, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s general score of 79.3. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has 10 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's body is much newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is notably thicker and way heavier.
Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations and a way larger sensor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.