Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a score of 83, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a older and way thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a bigger aperture, a much higher video quality, a much larger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.