Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 65.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-11-11 |
| 4.88 x 2.58 x 0.47 inches | 5.51 x 2.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.25 ounces | 4.64 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 100.00 | $ 104.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 2,3 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.32 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Battery | 3120mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 260 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has an overall score of 65.8, which is a lot better than the ZTE Avid 4G's global score of 46.4. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi 4a has 6.0 Marshmallow version while ZTE Avid 4G has Android 4.0 version. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a is a somewhat lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the ZTE Avid 4G.
ZTE Avid 4G counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, a much smaller display and a lot worse 800 x 480 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Avid 4G, because it has 16 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a bit better processing power than ZTE Avid 4G, because it has a greater number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a greater camera than ZTE Avid 4G, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a superior battery duration than ZTE Avid 4G, because it has a 3120mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a costs a bit more money than ZTE Avid 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.