Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 84.9 score against 80.2. Apple iPhone 11 Pro is an a little thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
IPhone 11 Pro features a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and 8 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 31% more battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.