Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 85 score against 80.2. The iPhone 8 is an older device than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but Apple managed to make it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a lot smaller display, a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a bit lower pixel density.
IPhone 8 has a bit faster processor than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has 2 less and slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes better photographs and videos than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments and a much better resolution camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 8, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
The iPhone 8 costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.