Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 81.3 score against 80.2. Although the Google Pixel XL is incredibly older and a little thicker than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's construction is still a bit lighter. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has more cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has better video frame rates, a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.