Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro is just a bit better than the LG V20, with a global score of 80.2 against 77. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro design is a lot newer than LG V20's, but it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
LG V20 has a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than LG V20, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 192 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features greater battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG V20, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.