Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than LG V30's 79.1 global score. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro design is newer than LG V30's, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V30 has just a bit better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher pixel density.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG V30, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 192 GB more internal storage. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and higher video frame rate. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V30. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy ZTE Axon 10 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG V30, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.