Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a global score of 83.7 against 80.2. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Although it's the best in this review, the LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better pixels count in each inch of display. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more internal memory.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.