Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a overall score of 86.5 against 80.2. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy M31 has 11 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy M31 is a newer phone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's somewhat thicker and just a little heavier.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M31, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M31 has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in poorly lited environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.