Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 85.5 score against 80.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is thicker and just a little heavier than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixels density. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a battery duration that's very similar to ZTE Axon 10 Pro's battery duration. ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a back-facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.