Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. Even though iPhone 8 is a lot older than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's design is just a little thinner and lighter. The Apple iPhone 8 features a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a way smaller display.
The iPhone 8 has a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera, a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and a much tinier sensor which provides a way lower image and video quality, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 8, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 120 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.