Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's score of 76.6. Even though Apple iPhone XS Max is older and heavier than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's construction is still just a little thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better CPU than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a slightly better screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1242 x 2688px resolution. IPhone XS Max shoots clearer photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, a lot worse resolution back facing camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features improved battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.