Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a overall score of 77 against 76.6. Even though LG V20 is extremely older than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is just a little lighter and a little thinner. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little better processing power than LG V20, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
LG V20 has a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V20 has a camera that's just as good as ZTE Axon 10s Pro's camera, because although the LG V20 has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality images, a much less MP resolution camera and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features greater battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.