Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, we must highlight that it's also somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in low light environments, and they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a 48 MP back camera, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.