Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 overall score. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a older and just a little heavier cellphone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has the previous 6.0 Marshmallow version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit larger display and a just a little greater display pixels density.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in ZTE Axon 10s Pro.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.