Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting an 83.3 score against 76.6. Although it's the best we compare here, the Galaxy M30s is a just a little bit heavier and thicker phone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy M30s has older 11 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a screen that's just as good as the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the display.
Galaxy M30s shoots much better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot better video quality. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a way better battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.