Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having a global score of 77.8 against 76.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and much thinner, but incredibly heavier than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a bigger display, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bigger memory for applications and games than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.