Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-03-30 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is better than the ZTE Axon 11, having a overall score of 84.9 against 76. Although it's the best phone we compare here, iPhone 11 Pro's body is just a bit thicker and heavier than the ZTE Axon 11. The iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while ZTE Axon 11 comes with Android 10 OS.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a superior processing unit than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a better looking screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit better pixel amount in each inch in the display.
ZTE Axon 11 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 2 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a much worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with greater battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 31% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.