Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is better than the ZTE Axon 11's global score of 76. The iPhone 8 is an older cellphone than the ZTE Axon 11, but it is lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The iPhone 8 has a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a much smaller display, a lot lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution and a just a little inferior pixels quantity in each display inch.
The iPhone 8 has just a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The ZTE Axon 11 features a superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 2 TB.
The iPhone 8 has just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography. The ZTE Axon 11 features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 120 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.