Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than ZTE Axon 11, with an 84.5 score against 76. Apple iPhone XS Max's design is just a bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 11, although it is heavier and was released just a bit more than a year before. Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a just a little greater screen density and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
ZTE Axon 11 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The iPhone XS Max has a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
ZTE Axon 11 features superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone XS Max captures clearer pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.