Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 11's global score of 76. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Motorola DROID Turbo design is notably older, a lot thicker and a little heavier than the ZTE Axon 11. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
ZTE Axon 11 features much more storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a lower video resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and video in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution.
The ZTE Axon 11 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.