Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 20's 77.8 score. Apple iPhone 11 Pro is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than ZTE Axon 20, but Apple was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 20 works with Android 10 OS.
IPhone 11 Pro features a sharper display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit higher display pixels density. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. ZTE Axon 20 counts with a really longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
The ZTE Axon 20 takes much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the ZTE Axon 20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the ZTE Axon 20, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.