Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 20, getting a global score of 85 against 77.8. Apple iPhone 8's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than ZTE Axon 20, even though it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit more powerful processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has lesser and slower CPU cores and 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 8 has a slightly better looking screen than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a way smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a just a bit worse display density. ZTE Axon 20 features a greater camera than iPhone 8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 20, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. ZTE Axon 20 features a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, else you can save some money and buy the ZTE Axon 20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.