Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 20, with a global score of 79.1 against 77.8. The LG V30 construction is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner than ZTE Axon 20, although it was released many years before. LG V30 counts with a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater screen density.
The LG V30 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 20 features a little better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 20 also has more RAM.
ZTE Axon 20 captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and faster video frame rate.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with superior battery life than LG V30, because it has a 28% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V30 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.