Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 20, having a 77.9 score against 77.8. Motorola DROID Turbo's design is lighter than ZTE Axon 20, although it is incredibly thicker and was released many years before. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version while ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The ZTE Axon 20 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit superior processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. The ZTE Axon 20 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also has faster video frame rate, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
The ZTE Axon 20 features a bit superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.