Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a global score of 85 against 78.1. IPhone 8 is an noticeably older cellphone than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's just a little thinner and extremely lighter anyway. The iPhone 8 has just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores and 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a much smaller screen, a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen. The iPhone 8 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots better photos and videos than iPhone 8, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much higher resolution back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
The Apple iPhone 8 is a bit more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.