Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is a bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 global score. The iPhone XS Max body is a little bit thinner than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it is just a little heavier and was released many years before. The iPhone XS Max features just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has less and slower cores and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max features just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better camera than iPhone XS Max, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light situations, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher video quality.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
IPhone XS Max is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.