Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| 2015-11-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.08 x 2.96 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a bit better than the ZTE Axon Lux, having a 77 score against 70.1. The LG V20 design is newer and noticeably thinner than the ZTE Axon Lux's, but it is also a little bit heavier. The ZTE Axon Lux has a bit more vivid screen than LG V20, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, the ZTE Axon Lux also counts with a bit higher pixels count per inch in the display.
LG V20 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than ZTE Axon Lux, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon Lux counts with a little bit better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the ZTE Axon Lux also has more processing cores (but slower).
LG V20 features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon Lux, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V20 also has a camera with a better resolution. LG V20 features just a bit better battery life than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V20 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.