Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| 2015-11-01 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.08 x 2.96 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is way better than ZTE Axon Lux's 70.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note9's construction is much newer and a little thinner than ZTE Axon Lux's, although it is somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note9 has just a little better performance than ZTE Axon Lux, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note9 has a screen that's very similar to ZTE Axon Lux's display, because although the Galaxy Note9 has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a larger display. The Galaxy Note9 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon Lux, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than ZTE Axon Lux, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9 has improved battery performance than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs a little more than the ZTE Axon Lux, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.