Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum; plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than ZTE Axon Lux, having a general score of 81.3 against 67.4. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better performance than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. ZTE Axon Lux features a slightly better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a bit smaller display and a little lower pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than ZTE Axon Lux, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a camera with a higher 16 MP resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon Lux, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than ZTE Axon Lux, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.