Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 67.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-07-21 | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum; plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 80.7, which is much better than the ZTE Axon Lux's overall score of 67.4. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while ZTE Axon Lux has Android 5.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon Lux, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores and an extra graphics co-processor.
ZTE Axon Lux counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixel number per screen inch. ZTE Axon Lux has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon Lux, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, they both have the same video frame rate, the same video definition and a 13 mega-pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.