Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.4 | 74.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-07-21 | 2017-01-23 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.82 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum; plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 190.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon Lux, getting a general score of 74.1 against 67.4. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has newer 7.0 Nougat version and ZTE Axon Lux has Android 5.1, providing you a couple nice extra features.
The ZTE Axon Lux counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the ZTE Axon Lux also has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a bit faster processing unit than ZTE Axon Lux, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 also has a larger number of 2000 MHz cores.
ZTE Axon Lux has a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has a 37% bigger battery size.
The ZTE Axon Lux shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the ZTE Axon Lux also has a lot better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.