Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum; plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is way better than ZTE Axon Pro's 66.5 general score. The Google Pixel 3 body is a lot newer, thinner and lighter than the ZTE Axon Pro. The Google Pixel 3 has a superior processing power than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 also has more processing cores.
ZTE Axon Pro has a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the ZTE Axon Pro also has a just a little greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon Pro, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a lower resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Google Pixel 3's storage capacity to install games and applications is very similar to ZTE Axon Pro's one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.