Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-07-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum; plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is better than ZTE Axon Pro, getting a score of 78.9 against 66.5. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a a lot newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than ZTE Axon Pro. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and ZTE Axon Pro has Android 5.1, so it offers some nice extra features.
ZTE Axon Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Google Pixel 3a XL has just a little better performance than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3a XL and ZTE Axon Pro both feature really similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3a XL has improved battery lifetime than ZTE Axon Pro, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon Pro, although it has a worse resolution back facing camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
The Google Pixel 3a XL costs a bit more than ZTE Axon Pro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.