Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-07-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Gray and Red |
| Aluminum; plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is much better than the ZTE Axon Pro, with a 76.4 score against 66.5. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is somewhat thicker but just a bit lighter than ZTE Axon Pro, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version while ZTE Axon Pro has Android 5.1.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little sharper display than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little better amount of pixels per screen inch. The ZTE Axon Pro features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more powerful processor than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores and an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Motorola DROID Turbo has superior battery life than ZTE Axon Pro, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the ZTE Axon Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.