Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum; plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than the ZTE Axon Pro's global score of 66.5. Galaxy S9's body is notably newer, a little lighter and thinner than ZTE Axon Pro. ZTE Axon Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S9, although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a bit lower screen density and a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S9 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a greater hardware performance than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has 7 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in ZTE Axon Pro. The Galaxy S9 features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S9 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.