Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Kyocera |
| Android 4.0, 2.3 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-29 |
| 4.53 x 2.28 x 0.43 inches | 4.21 x 2.22 x 0.99 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| $ 199.00 | $ 164.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 2.6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 267 pixels per inch | 154 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 204,8 MB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1530mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 2.88 | 3.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
Comparison review
The Kyocera DuraXV LTE has a general score of 50.8, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Blade II's global score of 46.4. Kyocera DuraXV LTE's design is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker than ZTE Blade II. The ZTE Blade II counts with a much better display than Kyocera DuraXV LTE, because it has a way greater pixels count per inch of display, a much larger display and a way better 800 x 480 resolution.
Kyocera DuraXV LTE features a much bigger storage for applications and games than ZTE Blade II, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 64 GB and 15,8 GB more internal storage capacity. Kyocera DuraXV LTE has a bit more powerful processing unit than ZTE Blade II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
ZTE Blade II counts with a bit better camera than Kyocera DuraXV LTE. Both have a same resolution back-facing camera. The Kyocera DuraXV LTE features longer battery lifetime than ZTE Blade II, because it has 1530mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Kyocera DuraXV LTE is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.