Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | ZTE |
| Android 4.0, 2.3 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 4.53 x 2.28 x 0.43 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 267 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 204,8 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 2.88 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go has a global score of 50.8, which is a little bit better than ZTE Blade II's 46.4 overall score. These phones use Android OS, but ZTE Tempo Go has newer 8.1 Oreo version and ZTE Blade II has Android 4.0. The ZTE Tempo Go construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than the ZTE Blade II.
ZTE Tempo Go features just a little better performance than ZTE Blade II, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 512 MB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. ZTE Blade II features a much better display than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a little lower 800 x 480 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch in the screen.
The ZTE Tempo Go takes a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Blade II. They have a same resolution back camera. The ZTE Tempo Go counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than ZTE Blade II, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Tempo Go has a much better battery life than ZTE Blade II, because it has an 83 percent larger battery size.
The ZTE Tempo Go not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.